The procedural learning deficit hypothesis of language learning disorders: we see some problems
Published online on March 02, 2017
Abstract
Impaired procedural learning has been suggested as a possible cause of developmental dyslexia (DD) and specific language impairment (SLI). This study examined the relationship between measures of verbal and non‐verbal implicit and explicit learning and measures of language, literacy and arithmetic attainment in a large sample of 7 to 8‐year‐old children. Measures of verbal explicit learning were correlated with measures of attainment. In contrast, no relationships between measures of implicit learning and attainment were found. Critically, the reliability of the implicit learning tasks was poor. Our results show that measures of procedural learning, as currently used, are typically unreliable and insensitive to individual differences. A video abstract of this article can be viewed at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnvV-BvNWSo
This study investigated the relationships between measures of verbal and non‐verbal declarative and procedural learning and attainment in language skills in a large unselected sample of children. We found that verbal declarative memory skills correlated with language ability. However, the procedural memory tasks were found to be unreliable and correlated poorly with each other and with measures of language skills.