Audience Design and Context Discrepancy: How Online Debates Lead to Opinion Polarization
Published online on July 19, 2018
Abstract
---
- "\nThis article examines how the technical layout of some online platforms shapes
the way individuals engage in public debate online. To do so, the research studies
an empirical case of how public debating on Weibo—China's equivalent to Twitter—leads
to opinion polarization. The technical layout of Weibo strongly influences how users
debate with others. The thread‐based message structure fragments the interactional
context, preventing users from gaining a clear picture about other discussants and
the ongoing conversation. Weibo's technical design, which enables simultaneous interactions
with multiple audiences (of which many users are unaware), further complicates the
debates. Consequently, users become confused about their audience and where their
replies are targeted, and subsequent interpersonal tension sparks as they adopt
interactive strategies (sharing personal experiences, adding situational elaborations,
and seeking solidarity through opinion) to reduce this confusion. Ironically, these
strategies often serve to further polarize opinions. A video abstract is available
at \nhttps://youtu.be/U5qdm6eiQ1M.\n"
- 'Symbolic Interaction, EarlyView. '