["The British Journal of Sociology, Volume 72, Issue 4, Page 930-945, September 2021. ", "\nAbstract\nResearch on elites and elite schooling mainly theorize the embodied elite distinction of ease as a dispositional phenomenon, drawing on a Bourdieusian framework. I respond to this by developing an interactionist perspective on embodied elite distinction not as a function of social position, but rather as means of communication used more or less actively to manage others' impressions of one's social position. Drawing on ethnography and interviews, I explore how students at two Swedish upper secondary schools with different elite profiles—an economic elite school and a meritocratic elite school—negotiate what counts as successful performances of their elite position in face‐to‐face interactions during conferences for “young leaders”. The findings suggest that in order for performances to be honored as “confident ease,” which is attributed with prestige and moral legitimacy in the peer group, the interacting students had to share the impression that the interaction was a “merit situation”. In interactions defined as “privilege situations,” similar behavior was labelled as arrogant superiority and seen as illegitimate performances of elite position. While “confident ease” was the hallmark of the male students at the economic elite school, the findings suggests that “confident awareness” may be understood as a contradictory mode of elite distinction characterizing the female students from the meritocratic elite school. They display confidence while simultaneously exploiting the unease they felt in the conference to craft a morally legitimate performance of their elite position. While the findings confirm that students' classed, gendered and moral dispositions are central to navigate elite distinction, they also demonstrate that meanings of such embodied distinctions emerge in relation to how situations are defined and are dependent on the interacting students' combined ability and interest to maintain working consensus on the definition of the situation.\n"]