["Journal of Law and Society, Volume 48, Issue 3, Page 455-480, September 2021. ", "\nAbstract\nReparations are widely regarded as a key element of dealing with the past in transitional justice. Over the past three decades, there has been a plethora of state practice, jurisprudence, and international norms requiring states and other responsible actors to redress victims’ harm. Yet in practice there remain significant deficiencies in delivering reparations on the ground to those affected. This article explores what victims and their civil society allies do to manage their suffering in the absence of or delay to reparations. Drawing upon fieldwork in seven societies transitioning from conflict, we suggest that victims find their own way to live with the past as they await reparations, through ‘self‐repair’ measures or through ‘informal repair’ provided by non‐governmental organizations. This alternative perspective aims to shed light on victims’ agency and resilience, as well as to critique notions of state dependence that a needs and rights discourse often encourages with victims. We also argue that victims’ self‐repair strategies and informal pathways can complement more formal measures, and be conducive to victims making the most of state‐based reparation programmes.\n"]