Tom Keenoy and Gustavo Seijo: Re-imagining E-mail: Academics in The Castle DOI: 10.1177/1350508409342610 On page 2 of this article, the sentence that reads: "Thus, while the primary analytic focus is on how academics discursively co-construct their engagement, opinions and experience of e-mail, we locate their views within a wider range of supplementary texts which, in turn, also translate e-mail through a variety of alternative, sometimes contradictory and occasionally disconcerting discourses which offer important clues on how to trace–if not e-mail." Should read: "Thus, while the primary analytic focus is on how academics discursively co-construct their engagement, opinions and experience of e-mail, we locate their views within a wider range of supplementary texts which, in turn, also translate e-mail through a variety of alternative, sometimes contradictory and occasionally disconcerting discourses which offer important clues on how to trace???if not entirely reassemble–'the social' through digital artefacts such as e-mail." The publishers apologise to the authors and readers for this error and any misunderstanding arising.