This study extended previous research on equivalence relations established with outcome‐specific reinforcers to include the merger of separately established stimulus classes. Participants were four adults. Conditional discriminations AC and BC were trained first. Correct selections of C1 (C2, or C3) in the presence of A1 or B1 (A2 or B2, or A3 or B3) were followed by red (blue, or white) tokens; tokens were exchanged for value added to three participant‐selected gift cards. Outcomes on equivalence tests for three‐member classes ABC were positive. DF and EF were trained with the same reinforcing consequences, and tests were positive for three‐member classes DEF. Results of class merger tests with combinations of stimuli from the ABC and DEF classes (AD, FB, etc.) were immediately positive for two participants, demonstrating six‐member classes ABCDEF with reinforcers as nodes. Merger tests for a third participant were initially negative but became positive after brief exposure to unreinforced probe trials with reinforcers as comparison stimuli. Following class merger, tests for matching the reinforcers to samples and comparisons were also positive. Class‐merger test results were negative for a fourth participant. The results provide the first demonstration of eight‐member equivalence classes including two outcome‐specific conditioned reinforcing stimuli.