Among the plethora of public values, one special class is that of "regime values." This notion plays a central role in the constitutional approach to public administration mainly developed by the late John A. Rohr. In this article, an attempt is made to assess the viability of Rohr’s concept of regime values and its applicability outside the United States. After brief overviews of the constitutional approach in general and Rohr’s use of the concept of regime values in particular, it is argued that Rohr’s conceptualizations of "regime" and "values" are too narrow and result in ambiguities within the concept of "regime values" itself. The applicability of the concept of "regime values" is unnecessarily affected by the typically American reference points Rohr uses and can best be improved, it is suggested, by treating "regime values" more frankly as an inherently normative concept.