Objectives: To present the rationale and arguments behind the proposition that the field of intimate partner violence (IPV) would greatly benefit from developing gold standard instrumentation that would be expected to advance this field of scientific inquiry and to propose a phased model for accomplishing the development of such instrumentation. Method: A summary critique of historical controversies in the measurement of IPV is presented and ongoing problems with assessment specific to IPV are raised. Current difficulties with measurement of the current structures of physical, sexual, and psychological abuse are delineated. The argument is made for measurement that demonstrates improvement over current instrumentation that would be used consistently by researchers in the field. Adapting existing models of phased trials and a task force with working groups to establish psychosocial constructs through empirically based consensus, a working plan is proposed to develop instrumentation that would exist as the gold standard instrumentation for IPV assessment. Conclusion: The creation of better validated measurement tools for the assessment of intimate partner abuse within intimate relationships would result in increased understanding of research findings, enhance comparability of research, increase credibility within the field, and produce a replicable working strategy for developing gold standard measurement in comparable fields. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)