MetaTOC stay on top of your field, easily

Towards a better understanding of standard determination and standard setting in the RANZCP summative assessments

,

Australasian Psychiatry

Published online on

Abstract

Objectives:

The authors outline the difference between content and performance standards and the rationale for standard setting at a medical college. The principles of the college’s standard setting processes for the written and objective structured clinical examination summative assessments are discussed in greater detail.

Conclusion:

There is no evidence of any single standard setting method to be the best. Multiple methods exist and will have varied results when applied. The judgement of a panel of subject experts remains an important component of the standard setting process.