The central Government of Malta has had an accrual accounting reform in process since 1999. Originally, the accrual accounting reform envisaged developing and implementing a tailor-made set of accounting standards. These were developed but not implemented. In 2011 the central Government of Malta decided instead to fully adopt IPSAS. By means of documentary research, supported by interviews, this study tries to identify the underlying factors that led to this decision. The institutional theoretical framework is used to analyse the findings. The findings show that, in Malta, credibility is regarded as the most important factor, which will be provided by the adoption of internationally recognised and accepted standards. It is claimed that EU pressure had nothing to do with the Maltese government’s decision on accounting policy, but an undercurrent of such potential pressure is experienced.

Points for practitioners

One advantage of an accrual accounting system is that accrual data is generated from the accounting system, but this accrual data would still need to be reviewed in order to make it ESA-compliant. The solution proposed by the EU Commission is to revise IPSAS and minimise the differences with ESA. The feasibility of this solution is questionable given that the objectives of IPSAS and ESA are different and relate to different types of reporting. They purport to measure the same thing, that is the deficits and debts of a government, but they do not. In order for such convergence to be considered, one financial measure would have to give way to the other.