Supporting public involvement in interview and other panels: a systematic review
Published online on August 17, 2016
Abstract
Background
Members of the public are increasingly being invited to become members of a variety of different panels and boards.
Objective
This study aimed to systematically search the literature to identify studies relating to support or training provided to members of the public who are asked to be members of an interview panel.
Search strategy
A systematic search for published and unpublished studies was carried out from June to September 2015. The search methods included electronic database searching, reference list screening, citation searching and scrutinizing online sources.
Inclusion criteria
We included studies of any design including published and unpublished documents which outlined preparation or guidance relating to public participants who were members of interview panels or representatives on other types of panels or committees.
Data synthesis
Results were synthesised via narrative methods.
Main results
Thirty‐six documents were included in the review. Scrutiny of this literature highlighted ten areas which require consideration when including members of the public on interview panels: financial resources; clarity of role; role in the interview process; role in evaluation; training; orientation/induction; information needs; terminology; support; and other public representative needs such as timing, accessibility and support with information technology.
Discussion and conclusions
The results of the review emphasize a range of elements that need to be fully considered when planning the involvement of public participants on interview panels. It highlights potential issues relating to the degree of involvement of public representatives in evaluating/grading decisions and the need for preparation and on‐going support.