["Social Science Quarterly, Volume 102, Issue 3, Page 1199-1218, May 2021. ", "\n\nObjective\nIn this article, we consider the materialization of collective memory in monumental architecture, including Confederate monuments.\n\n\nMethod\nUsing Goodman's typology for uncovering social meaning in the built environment, we consider the material, symbolic, and temporal meanings of two memorial spaces, the Alabama Confederate Memorial Monument and the National Peace and Justice Memorial.\n\n\nResults\nThe analysis uncovers competing social meanings in these two memorials. Attention to the denoted, expressive, and mediated references of these spaces highlights this competing meaning. Rather than an inclusive history, Montgomery presents a case of competing exclusive histories.\n\n\nConclusions\nThere are significant implications for historic preservation and interpretive heritage landscapes when private and nonprofit organizations take action in narrating space that is at odds with narrated space supported by state and local governments. Communities include diverse stakeholders. The evolution of urban growth and development in Montgomery, Alabama, provides a valuable case study for understanding change that is both incremental rather than comprehensive and contradictory rather than cohesive.\n\n"]