["Social Science Quarterly, EarlyView. ", "\nAbstract\n\nObjective\nWe investigate the question: How should immigrants pursue policy in a system that privileges majority rule? Scholars suggest that opinion backlash impedes policy gains by marginalized groups. That is, pushing too hard for policy leads to backlash, a sharp and sustained negative reaction among citizens that delays these groups’ ability to obtain their desired policy.\n\n\nMethods\nExamining immigration, we develop and test two plausible alternatives to backlash: opinion elite cues and opinion stability. We use experimental and observational data.\n\n\nResults\nWe find no evidence of backlash. Instead, we find modest evidence attitudes move in the direction of the cues provided by party elites.\n\n\nConclusion\nImmigrants and other marginalized groups should pursue rights without fear of opinion backlash.\n\n"]