The incidence and prevalence of death by suicide and nonlethal suicidal behaviors such as suicide attempts, thoughts, and feelings are increasing in the United States and throughout the world. Efforts to prevent suicide deaths and suicide attempts, and reduce the likelihood that suicidal thoughts and feelings will lead to those outcomes, rest on the accuracy of suicide risk assessments primarily conducted in the context of clinical interviews. Despite being armed with lists of empirically derived "correlates" of suicide (i.e., risk factors), suicide risk assessment continues to be a challenging task faced by counseling psychologists and other mental health professionals on a daily basis. As Shea (1999) has suggested, this challenge in a large part is a function of differing values and beliefs regarding suicide between the clinician and the client that create barriers to accurate assessment. The thesis of this contribution to the Major Contribution is that the barriers to suicide risk assessment are much broader than values and beliefs when in the context of cultural differences between the clinician and client. Thus, we present an argument for the adoption of a set of compatibility heuristics as a framework for suicide risk assessment in the cross-cultural suicide risk assessment environment.