["The Journal of Physiology, EarlyView. ", "\nAbstract figure legend Patients with fibromyalgia (FM) and no‐pain controls completed questionnaire‐based ratings of chronic pain, childhood trauma, anxiety and depression. Brief touch stimuli were then administered, including slow brushing at the C‐tactile optimal velocity of 3 cm/s, deep oscillating pressure with a compression sleeve, roboticized tapping and heat pain administered via thermode. Brushing and pressure were intended as pleasant affective stimuli. When participant ratings of these stimuli were compared, all touch types were rated as less pleasant and more intense by FM patients. Chronic pain intensity predicted reductions in touch pleasantness, whereas affective symptoms predicted affective touch preference (slow brushing vs. tapping) and heat pain unpleasantness.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nAbstract\nGentle stroking that activates C‐tactile afferents is typically pleasant, calming and pain relieving. Deep pressure touch frequently elicits similar affective responses. However touch is often less pleasant for individuals with chronic pain. It is important to understand the reasons for this clinical difference because of the close relationship of pain with reduced social connection, and the widespread use of touch‐based therapies for pain relief. It is not known whether differences in touch perception in chronic pain relate to pain‐specific processes or to comorbid affective symptoms. The current study compared affective touch perception in adults with the chronic pain condition fibromyalgia (FM) and no‐pain (NP) controls, and the contributions of pain, depression, anxiety and trauma history to differences in touch perception. We hypothesized that deep pressure – like gentle stroking – would be less pleasant in FM and that these differences would be associated with depression and trauma history. Touch was rated as significantly less pleasant and more intense in FM. Chronic pain intensity best predicted reductions in touch pleasantness, whereas preferences for brushing versus tapping (affective touch preference) were positively predicted by depression and anxiety scores. In contrast heat pain unpleasantness was significantly predicted only by depression and anxiety. These results suggest that blunted touch pleasantness in FM is best explained by pain‐specific processes, whereas pain unpleasantness is more closely associated with affective processes.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nKey points\n\nPleasant touch perception is often reduced in chronic pain, but the reasons for this are not clear.\nPatients with fibromyalgia (FM) and no‐pain controls rated their perception of gentle stroking, deep pressure and heat pain.\nAll touch types were less pleasant and more intense in FM participants.\nChronic pain intensity predicted reductions in touch pleasantness, whereas affective symptoms predicted affective touch preference and heat pain unpleasantness.\nFindings suggest that blunted touch pleasantness in FM is more related to pain processes than to comorbid affective symptoms.\n\n\n"]