["Australian Psychologist, Volume 55, Issue 6, Page 700-714, December 2020. ", "\nAbstract\n\nObjective\nIn 2017, the Australian Government announced that a voluntary postal survey would be used to quantify the views of the Australian public on marriage equality. This non‐binding, voluntary postal survey—and the associated public debate—can be viewed as a discriminatory event for same‐sex attracted Australians. The exacerbation of minority stress likely imposed by this unexpected event has resulted in an unprecedented demand for psychological services by members of this community. Despite this surge of use, relatively little is known about the specifics of the impact of this discriminatory event.\n\n\nMethod\nIn this article, we present the findings of a thematic analysis of semi‐structured interviews that qualitatively examined the impact of the marriage equality debate among a sample of 14 Australians (eight sexual minority and six affected ‘allies’).\n\n\nResults\nTwo themes were identified from the interviews, each with four subthemes: (a) personal impacts (emotional wellbeing, empathic concern, devaluation, and connection to religion), and (b) social impacts (activism, avoidant behaviour, social connections, and societal perceptions).\n\n\nConclusions\nOverall, the findings of the current study reveal a range of intra‐ and inter‐personal negative impacts of public debate about the equal rights of same‐sex attracted people to marry. Moreover, the results suggest that the impact is not only on this minority and at‐risk group but also on their heterosexual allies. These results can help inform future policy with the aim of decreasing minority stress experienced by same‐sex attracted people.\n\n"]