["Sociological Forum, EarlyView. ", "\nABSTRACT\nA sociology of suicide plainly exists in a historical sense. Since Durkheim, sociologists have ssshown that suicide varies with integration, regulation, inequality, relational embeddedness, institutional arrangements, and cultural repertoires of meaning. The stronger question concerns the conditions under which this work coheres as a field. This essay argues that a specifically sociological explanation of suicide locates suicidal trajectories within patterned inequalities and institutional settings, identifies the meso‐level arrangements through which these conditions are enacted, and situates action within available vocabularies, scripts, and moral classifications. Reconsidering structural, interpretive, cultural, relational, critical, intersectional, and digital contributions through this lens shows that the field's strongest insights arise when structure, relation, and meaning are treated as mutually constitutive. The essay contends that sociology's contribution weakens when social variables become residual risk markers inside clinical and epidemiological models. A coherent sociology of suicide requires a mechanism‐based account of how social worlds distribute vulnerability, organize recognition, shape interpretation, and channel access to support.\n"]